Filtek™ Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative Comparison to SonicFill™ Composite Hero

How does your bulk fill composite compare?

Filtek™ Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative resists wear, retains polish and handles better than SonicFill™, and is faster and easier to use. See why you should make the switch!

Use the bulk fill restorative preferred by a majority of dentists. And find 4 more reasons to smile!

  • Bulk fill restorations should be fast and simple. But some composites, like SonicFill™, require additional dispensing devices – just so you can place them in bulk.
    It’s time to dispense with the extra equipment. Filtek™ Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative allows for a fast and easy placement up to 5 mm, with excellent adaptation – and no expensive dispensing devices!

Try it today!

If you’re thinking of making the switch, request your FREE sample today – and see for yourself why Filtek™ stands out over the competition.

See how it works

Top 4 reasons to choose Filtek™ Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative over SonicFill™ Composite

  • Filtek™ Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative handling icon
    Handling

    You’re sure to like the way it handles.

    View comparison chart

     

  • Filtek™ Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative polish retention icon
    Polish retention

    Your restorations will have significantly higher polish retention.

    View comparison chart

     

  • Filtek™ Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative dispensing placement Icon
    Dispensing & placement

    You’ll like the simpler dispensing and placement method – no expensive devices needed.

    View comparison chart

     

  • Filtek™ Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative wear resistance Icon
    Wear resistance

    Your restorations will wear significantly less – for long-term durability that’s sure to please your patients.

    View comparison chart

     

Handling

Filtek™ Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative offers excellent sculptability and adaptation. A majority of dentists prefer the handling of Filtek Bulk Fill restorative over SonicFill™ Composite.

Based on a simulated operatory study.
Source: 3M internal data

Polish retention

After 6000 cycles, restorations using Filtek™ Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative retain their polish at substantially higher gloss levels than restorations using SonicFill™ Composite.

Source: 3M internal data

Dispensing & placement

A majority of dentists preferred Filtek™ Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative over SonicFill™ Composite when comparing dispensing method and placement technique.

Based on a simulated operatory study.
Source: 3M internal data

Wear resistance

In a 3-body wear test, Filtek™ Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative demonstrated almost 2x the wear resistance as SonicFill™ Composite.

Source: 3M internal data

Follow Us
The brands listed above are trademarks of 3M.
Change Location
Indonesia - English